The National Geographic’s Judas Fraud
Thanks to National Geographic, it has now become common knowledge that “Judas wrote a Gospel” and that “Jesus asked Judas to betray him.” Just as the “Da Vinci Code” has made it common knowledge that “Jesus was married to Mary Magdalene and that they had children together.” If you doubt that these “facts” are now common knowledge, just ask a few teenagers about the subject and you will quickly learn some of the absolute nonsense they believe and are even being taught in school.
It is shocking but true. National Geographic allowed itself to become the vehicle for this type of scholarly abuse. The Biblical Archaeological Review among others have now blown the whistle on this fraud of which the National Geographic has made itself a part. In May of 2006 the Geographic ran a large article headlined on its cover as “The Judas Gospel.” The Judas Gospel is a document that surfaced in Egypt in the 1970’s. The facts around its discovery are somewhat murky but radiocarbon dating of the manuscript puts its origin between 220 and 340 AD. It is written in Coptic but is alleged to be a copy of a currently nonexistent earlier Greek Gnostic text. In the early days of Christianity one of the more popular heretical groups were the Gnostics. This group claimed to have “secret knowledge” about God and Jesus. The Nag Hammadi Codices, which also contained the apocryphal Gospel of Thomas, represent the largest collection of surviving writings of this sect. This Gospel of Judas is also a product of the Gnostics. These writings were known to be frauds since the second century and have been recognized as such by scholars, secular and Christian alike. This information was no secret to the staff of the National Geographic.
Despite knowing exactly what these documents were the Biblical Archeology Review points out that the Geographic staff went ahead and, not only misrepresented what these documents were, but shockingly went even further and reported clear mistranslations of these the documents to further cloud the issue. So the Geographic took a fraud and made it more fraudulent. Even Dan Rather and CBS would not have gone this far; at least CBS correctly reported what the fraudulent documents they used actually said.
According to the Biblical Archeology Review (BAR) the Geographic, “In the first instance, it pitches its enormous publicity machine to imply that the newly released Gospel of Judas contains what may be a historically reliable portrait of Judas Iscariot, not as he is portrayed in the New Testament as Jesus’ betrayer, but as a hero, the thirteenth disciple who is closer to Jesus than the other twelve.” Then in the National Geographic version, “Jesus asks Judas to betray him.” So they treat this known counterfeit as though it is a reliable historical source. As the BAR points out, “In fact , no scholar would treat it this way, including the National Geographic scholars themselves.” ‘”The idea that this new gospel might be an accurate historical report of the reason for Judas’s betrayal of Jesus is arrogant nonsense.”‘
As if this was not bad enough the Geographic goes further and mistranslates the documents in key areas. For example the Judas Gospel does not actually portray Judas as a hero. This is an invention of the Geographic. In their attempt to turn Judas from a villain into a hero they make key misrepresentations. A glaring case is seen in Judas 46:25-47:1. The Geographic has Jesus saying to Judas, “You will ascend to the holy generation.” In the document it says exactly the opposite, it actually says “You will not ascend to the holy generation.” There are numerous other examples that could be cited for those who are interested. You may want to begin with the source article listed below.
Why Is This Important
A big question that comes to mind is, why would the National Geographic lend itself to this abuse? Why would they engage in such fraud? The only purpose that seems apparent is an attempt to advance the materialist agenda by undermining Christian faith. Do any readers have another suggestion?
Source: “Judas Iscariot Among the Gnostics: What the Gospel of Judas Really Says”, Biblical Archeology Review, by Birger Pearson, May/June 2008, Vol 34, No. 3, pp 52-57.
By: Lawrence Vescera Ph.D.
May 17th, 2008 at 6:38 pm
[…] The Political Chase wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptThe National Geographic’s Judas Fraud May 17th, 2008 Thanks to National Geographic, it has now become common knowledge that “Judas wrote a Gospel” and that “Jesus asked Judas to betray him.” Just as the “Da Vinci Code” has made it common knowledge that “Jesus was married to Mary Magdalene and that they had children together.” If you doubt that these “facts” are now common knowledge, just ask a few teenagers about the subject and you will quickly learn some of the absolute nonsense they believ […]
July 15th, 2008 at 5:48 pm
Without getting totally into this, I think it is fairly well known that most obvious attempts at revising the Christian story comes primarily from an unhealthy Jewish interest in this topic to ‘prove Judaism’ at the expense of Christianity, along with some Masonic elements, the two of which can be quite entangled.
Gnosticism is a kind of ‘Dungeons and Dragons version’ of an early attempt to subvert Christianity by Jewish activists at the time, and has by chance found a tiny bit of success today in the rediscovery of the Judas ‘gospel’ and through the media, has tried to do hundreds of years later, exactly what it was designed to do at the time.
If you doubt Judaism’s strongly anti-Christian leanings which remain a bit of a taboo a very interesting book is by Dr Peter Shaffer called ‘Jesus in the Talmud’. I think Shaffer is the head of Judaic studies at Princeton, where he concludes, pretty much from start to finish, the Talmud represents an ‘anti-Christian polemic”
Doumiago
February 11th, 2009 at 9:49 am
Nice post i likeit. Keep posting more.
Thanks
May 27th, 2009 at 10:49 pm
Shane Cauley from Wyoming said the same thing about that topic, It doesn’t suprise me one bit.
shane cauley cheyenne
June 15th, 2009 at 11:03 pm
I think I will try to recommend this post to my friends and family, cuz it’s really helpful.
April 15th, 2010 at 12:32 pm
Your blog keeps getting better and better! Your older articles are not as good as newer ones you have a lot more creativity and originality now. Keep it up!
And according to this article, I totally agree with your opinion, but only this time!
April 25th, 2010 at 7:29 pm
Thanks for taking this prospectto talk about this, I feel strongly about it and I benefit from learning about this subject. If possible, as you gain data, please update this blog with new information. I have found it extremelyuseful.
September 7th, 2010 at 10:28 am
< blockquote >< a href=”http://cheaptabletsonline.com/”>CheapTabletsOnline.com. Canadian Health&Care.No prescription online pharmacy.Special Internet Prices.Best quality drugs. Low price drugs. Order pills online< /a >…
Buy:Zithromax.Viagra.Propecia.Levitra.Super Active ED Pack.Viagra Super Force.Cialis Professional.Cialis Super Active+.Viagra Soft Tabs.Viagra Super Active+.VPXL.Cialis.Soma.Maxaman.Cialis Soft Tabs.Viagra Professional.Tramadol….
January 6th, 2012 at 6:34 pm
advair diskus…
advair diskus…